Audiology - Communication Research
https://audiolcommres.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-6431-2025-3032pt
Audiology - Communication Research
Artigo Original

Autopercepção de competência comunicativa e traços de personalidade em professores universitários

Self-perception of communicative competence and personality traits in university professors

Caroline Azevedo Maciel; Carmen Flores-Mendoza; Adriane Mesquita de Medeiros; Letícia Caldas Teixeira

Downloads: 0
Views: 8

Resumo

Objetivo: analisar a relação da autopercepção de competência comunicativa com os traços de personalidade em professores universitários.

Métodos: estudo observacional, transversal, realizado com 100 professores universitários. Os instrumentos utilizados foram o Teste de Autoavaliação de Competência Comunicativa (TACCom), o Inventário de Personalidade HEXACO-60 e um questionário com perguntas sociodemográficas. Os instrumentos foram enviados aos participantes por meio da plataforma Google Forms. A variável resposta foi baseada no TACCom, a variável explicativa, na resposta obtida pelo HEXACO-60. O gênero e a idade foram as covariáveis.

Resultados: o grupo de professores universitários com maiores pontuações na autopercepção de competência comunicativa também apresentou pontuações mais elevadas nos domínios Honestidade-Humildade e Conscienciosidade do HEXACO-60. A Conscienciosidade foi o domínio de personalidade que se associou à autopercepção de competência comunicativa no modelo multivariado. Cada unidade de aumento na pontuação de Conscienciosidade esteve associada a um aumento de 2% na chance de apresentar uma percepção mais positiva da competência comunicativa.

Conclusão: professores universitários que se autopercebem como bons comunicadores tendem a apresentar altas pontuações no domínio Conscienciosidade do HEXACO-60. Assim, características do traço de conscienciosidade como planejamento de tempo, organização, compromisso, foco no trabalho/objetivos parecem favorecer a autopercepção da habilidade de comunicação oral dos professores universitários.

Palavras-chave

Docentes; Comunicação; Fala; Voz; Personalidade

Abstract

Purpose: to analyze the association between self-perceived communicative competence and personality traits in university professors.

Methods: observational, cross-sectional study conducted with 100 university professors. The instruments used were the Self-Assessment Test of Communicative Competence (TACCom), the HEXACO-60 Personality Inventory, and a questionnaire with sociodemographic questions. The instruments were sent to participants via the Google Forms platform. The response variable was based on TACCom, the explanatory variable was the response obtained from HEXACO-60, with sex and age as covariates.

Results: the group of university professors with higher scores in self-perceived communicative competence also showed higher scores in the Honesty-Humility and Conscientiousness domains of HEXACO. Conscientiousness was the personality domain associated with self-perceived communicative competence in the multivariate model. Each unit increase in the Conscientiousness score was associated with a 2% increase in the likelihood of having a more positive perception of communicative competence.

Conclusion: university professors who perceive themselves as good communicators tend to score high in Conscientiousness. Thus, characteristics of the Conscientiousness trait, such as time management, organization, commitment, and focus on work/goals, appear to favor university professors' self-perception of oral communication skills.

Keywords

Teachers; Communication; Speech; Voice; Personality

Referências

1 Braga EM, Silva MJP. Competent communication a view of nurse experts in communication. Acta Paul Enferm. 2007;20(4):410-4. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000400004.

2 Netto BR. Conceptions of teacher of IES for articulated communicative and expressive development on evaluation of students on this performance. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(1):25-39. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462012005000004.

3 Tonon IG, Gomes NR, Teixeira LC, Medeiros AM. Self-referred personal behavior profile of university professors: association with communicative and vocal self-evaluation. CoDAS. 2020;32(2):1-7. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018141. PMid:32049096.

4 Grilo APS, Pina-Oliveira AA, Puggina ACG. Competence in interpersonal communication: relationships with social characteristics and anxiety trait. Rev Min Enferm. 2021;25(1):1-10. http://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762-20210053.

5 Gonçalves LCF, Alves RA, Campos G. A importância do relacionamento interpessoal no ambiente de trabalho em uma instituição pública. RCA. 2021;10(20):1-9.

6 Ribeiro VV, Santos MAC, Almeida AAF, Behlau M. Validation of the Self-assessment of Communication Competence (SACCom) in Brazilian Portuguese Through Item Response Theory. J Voice. 2025;39(1):279.e7-279.e20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.013. PMid:36088205.

7 Barbosa N, Cavalcantia ES, Nevesa EAL, Chaves TA, Coutinho FA, Mortimer EF. The expressiveness of the university teacher as cognitive factor in the teach-learning. Ciênc Cogn. 2009;14(1):75-102.

8 Martinez CC, Gurge LG, Magalhães CR. Communicative competences in professors and health professionals education: an exploratory study. J Speech Pathol Ther. 2016;1(101):1-5. http://doi.org/10.4172/2472-5005.1000101.

9 Sintra ARA, Abdullah AN. Personality traits and nonverbal communication skills of malaysian tesl trainee practitioners. JLC. 2017;4(1):12-24.

10 Lira AAM, Borrego MC, Behlau M. Self-assessment of communication resources used by sales representatives and its relation with sales performance. CoDAS. 2019;31(6):e20190067. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192019067. PMid:31721891.

11 Okoli AC. Relating communication competence to teaching effectiveness: implication for teacher education. J Educ Pract. 2017;8(3):150-4.

12 Vieira AC, Behlau M. Voice and oral communication analysis of preparatory school teachers. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2009;14(3):346-51. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342009000300010.

13 Azevedo LL, Martins PC, Mortimer EF, Quadros AL, Sá EF, Moro L, et al. Expressivity resources used by a university professor. Distúrb Comun. 2014;26(4):777-89.

14 Rodrigues ALV, Medeiros AM, Teixeira LC. Impact of the teacher’s voice in the classroom: a literature review. Distúrb Comun. 2017;29(1):2-9. http://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2017v29i1p2-9.

15 Ihmeideh FM, Al-Omari AA, Al-Dababneh KA. Attitudes toward Communication Skills among Students’-Teachers’ in Jordanian Public Universities. Aust J Teach Educ. 2010;5(4):1-11. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n4.1.

16 Khan A, Khan S, Khan SZ, Khan M. Impact of teacher personality on the academics of the students. J Phy Edu Res. 2016;3(2):74-9.

17 Göncz L. Teacher personality: a review of psychological research and guidelines for a more comprehensive theory in educational psychology. Open Review Of Educational Research. 2017;4(1):75-95. http://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1339572.

18 Noreen S, Ali A, Munawar U. The Impact of Teachers’ Personality on Students’. Academic Achievement in Pakistan. 2019;5(3):92-102. http://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).11.

19 Silva IB, Nakano TC. Big Five factor model: research analysis. Aval Psicol. 2011;10(1):51-62.

20 Almeida AAF, Fernandes LR, Azevedo EHM, Pinheiro RSA, Lopes LW. Characteristics of voice and personality of patients with vocal fold immobility. CoDAS. 2015;27(2):178-85. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20152014144. PMid:26107084.

21 Dhillon N, Kaur G. Impact of personality traits on communication effectiveness of teachers: exploring the mediating role of their communication style. SAGE Open. 2023;13(2):1-15. http://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231168049.

22 Peixoto AC, Meneses RF. Os cinco grandes fatores de personalidade e as habilidades sociais: revisão das relações. E-REI. 2018;6:1-32. http://doi.org/10.34630/erei.vi6.4039.

23 Koppensteiner M, Grammer K. Body movements of male and female speaker sand their influence on perceptions of Personality. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;51(6):743-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.014.

24 Ahmed J, Naqvi I. Personality Traits and Communication Styles Among University Students. Pak J Soc Clin Psychol. 2015;13(2):53-9.

25 Bozkurt B, Çevik H, Paksoy AB. Personality traits as a predictor of communication competencies of school administrators. Int J Educ Res Rev. 2023;8(4):889-900. http://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1291778.

26 Arif MI, Rashid A, Tahira SS, Akhter M. Personality and teaching: an investigation into prospective teachers’ personality. Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2012;2(17):161-71.

27 Karim D, Chowdhury S, Majid A, Rubel M, Rimi N, Amin M. Linking HEXACO personality traits to affective commitment and knowledge sharing behaviour in higher education institutions. J Inf Knowl Manag. 2024;6:2450087. http://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649224500874.

28 Ashton MC, Lee K. The HEXACO–60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. J Pers Assess. 2009;91(4):340-5. http://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878. PMid:20017063.

29 Lee K, Ashton MC. Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment. 2018;25(5):543-56. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134. PMid:27411678.

30 Costa ARL, Jesuíno ADSA, Lima NRS, Shu F. Adaptation and validation of HEXACO-PI-R to a Brazilian sample adaptation of HEXACO-PI-R to Brazilian sample. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;147(1):280-4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.044.

31 Rafi A, Jafri SSAM, Ashraf Z, Scholar I. HEXACO model of personality traits and beliefs about diversity in pre-service teachers. Asian J Bus Manag. 2012;4(1):95-100.

32 Zettler I, Thielmann I, Hilbig BE, Moshagen M. The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-scale Meta-analytic Investigation. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15(3):723-60. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036. PMid:32324493.

33 Ashton MC, Lee K. Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11(2):150-66. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907. PMid:18453460.

34 Weisberg YJ, DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front Psychol. 2011;2(178):1-11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178. PMid:21866227.

35 Wilmota MP, Onesb DS. A century of research on conscientiousness at work. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(46):23004-10. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908430116. PMid:31666330.

36 Behlau M, Barbara M. Comunicação consciente: o que comunico quando me comunico. Rio de Janeiro: Thieme Revinter; 2022.

37 Thuy TN, Le TML. Personality traits and their influences on communication skills: the case of Khmer Students in Vietnam. Int J Innov. 2020;13(7):524-40.

38 Hasani PM, Mokhtaree M, Fathollahi MS, Farokhzadian J. Interpersonal communication skills and its association with Personality dimensions of nurses in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2015. JOHE. 2018;7(2):112-8. http://doi.org/10.29252/johe.7.2.112.

39 Owen KF, Çelik DN. Investigating communication skills inadults according to theirgender, age and Personality. J Hum Sci. 2019;15(4):2305-21. http://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i4.5394.
 


Submetido em:
21/02/2025

Aceito em:
16/09/2025

699ee346a9539550221420a9 acr Articles
Links & Downloads

Audiol. Commun. Res.

Share this page
Page Sections