Resultados de programas de aprimoramento vocal para estudantes de comunicação: comparação de duas propostas de treinamento
Results of vocal improvement programs for communication students: a comparison of two training approaches
Maria Cristina de Menezes Borrego; Mara Behlau
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the results of two vocal training programs for communication students.
Methods: VP, focused on vocal aspects, and EP, focused on oral expressiveness. 103 students, 46 in VP (16 men and 30 women, mean age of 20.6 years old) and 57 in EP (10 men and 47 women, mean age of 20.2 years old). Small groups were formed with an average of 20 participants per group, randomly distributed between VP and EP. The programs consisted of eight meetings, once a week, and lasted two hours each. The pre- and post-training moments were analyzed to verify the effects of each program and the results obtained post-training in VP and EP were compared. Voice and communicative competence self-assessment protocols, a questionnaire to assess communication engagement and performance in training, and auditory-perceptual judgment of pre- and post-training text readings were applied.
Results: The students of both groups evaluated better their voice and their communication post-training, no statistical difference between them. EP students considered themselves more involved and with better communication performance, with a statistically significant difference compared to VP. The reading was considered better post-training, with better use of speech rate, pauses, modulation and emphases.
Conclusions: When comparing two vocal training programs for communication students, there was a difference in self-assessment results in specific questionnaires. Participants in an oral expressiveness program considered themselves more involved and with better communication performance. Pre- and post-training comparison showed positive results in both programs.
Keywords
Referências
1 Rodero E, Diaz-Rodrigues C, Larrea O. A training model for improving journalists’ voices. J Voice. 2018;32(3):386.e11-9.
2 Oliveira P, Ribeiro VV, Constantini AC, Cavalcante MEOB, Sousa MS, Silva K. Prevalence of work-related voice disorders in voice professionals: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. 2022.
3 Hazlett DE, Duffy OM, Moorhead SA. Review of the impact of voice training on the vocal quality of professional voice users: implications for vocal health and recommendations for further research. J Voice. 2011;25(2):181-91.
4 Warhurst S, McCabe P, Madill C. What makes a good voice for radio: perceptions of radio employers and educators. J Voice. 2013;27(2):217-24.
5 Peninni C, Vieira VP, Moreti F, Madazio G, Behlau M. Identification of communicative aspects in television reporters’ locution. Distúrb Comun. 2018;30(4):776-84.
6 Morales TC, Ferreira LP. The mirror game: the interference of stereotypes in the speech of radio and podcast communicators. Distúrb Comun. 2022;34(2):e54784.
7 Borrego MCM, Behlau M. Emphatic accent used by individuals with and without voice and speech training. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(2):216-24.
8 Penteado RZ, Pechula MR. Expressiveness in Journalism: interfaces between Communication, Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Education. RBCC. 2018;41(1):153-66.
9 Rodrigues DA, Simões-Zenari M, Cota AR, Nemr K. Voice and communication in news anchors: what is the impact of the passage of time? J Voice. 2024;38(2):384-91.
10 Oliveira GC, Farghaly SM, Silva MAA. Fonoaudiologia e formação profissional em rádio e televisão: uma relação produtiva. Distúrb Comun. 2013;25(2):293-6.
11 Neiva TMA, Gama ACC, Teixeira LC. Vocal and body expressiveness to speak well in telejournalism: training results. Rev CEFAC. 2016;18(2):498-507.
12 Santos TD, Ferreira LP, Silva MAA. Speech-language pathology in the preparation of journalists: results of an action plan. Audiol Commun Res. 2019;24:e2235.
13 Batista DJ, Conceição AS. Auditory-perceptual effects of an oral communication training on university radio broadcasters. Distúrb Comun. 2021;33(3):557-70.
14 Ferreira LP, Borrego MCM, Silva AA, Santos TP, Silva MZ, Zuleta PPB, et al. Vocal and Respiratory Conditioning (VRC) Program: intervention proposal for voice professional. Distúrb Comun. 2021;33(2):357-64.
15 Simões-Zenari M, Cota AR, Rodrigues DA, Nemr K. Do professionals who use the voice in a journalistic context benefit from humming as a semi-occluded vocal tract exercise? J Voice. 2023;37(4):634. PMid:33895007.
16 Oliveira P, Ribeiro VV, Florêncio DSF, Palhano M, Gonçalves RR, Nascimento MA. Vocal training in healthy individuals: a scoping review. J Voice. 2024;38(5):1250. PMid:35400555.
17 Ferreira LP, Borrego MCM, Silva AA, Silva MZ, Zuleta PPB, Escorcio R. Vocal and Respiratory Conditioning Program (CVR II): new proposal for voice professional. Distúrb Comun. 2023;35(1):e59350.
18 Ribeiro VV, Nascimento W, Silva RC, Gonçalves FM, Santos RS, Behlau M, et al. Evidence on vocal interventions in adults: a scoping review. J Voice. 2023; (in press).
19 Behlau M, Feijó D, Madazio G, Rehder MI, Azevedo R, Ferreira AE. Voz profissional: aspectos gerais e atuação fonoaudiológica. In: Behlau M, organizador. Voz: o livro do especialista. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2005. v. 2, p. 287-407.
20 Behlau M, Moreti F, Pecoraro G. Condicionamento vocal individualizado para profissionais da voz cantada – relato de casos. Rev CEFAC. 2014;16(5):1713-22.
21 Borrego MCM, Behlau M. A mapping of the Speech Language Pathologist practice pathway in verbal expressivity in the work of communicative competence. CoDAS. 2018;30(6):e20180054.
22 Bajard E. Ler e dizer: compreensão e comunicação do texto escrito. 6. ed. São Paulo: Cortez; 2014. 127 p.
23 Kleiman A. Oficina de leitura: teoria e prática. 15. ed. Campinas: Pontes; 2013. 155 p.
24 Costa T, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Validation of the Voice Handicap Index: 10 (VHI-10) to the Brazilian Portuguese. CoDAS. 2013;25(5):482-5.
25 Cheek JM. The revised Cheek and Buss shyness scale [Internet]. 1983 [cited 2015 Apr 18]. Available from:
26 Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Santos LMA, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4):506.e9-18.
27 Fernandes G, Madazio G, Vaiano TCG, Behlau M. Timidez e desvantagem vocal em profissionais da voz. Audiol Commun Res. 2020;25:e2304.
28 Ribeiro VV, Santos MAC, Almeida AAF, Behlau M. Validation of the Self-assessment of Communication Competence (SACCom) in Brazilian Portuguese Through Item Response Theory. J Voice. 2025;39(1):279. PMid:36088205.
29 Batista DJ, Conceição AS. Self-perception of the effects of oral communication training in public speaking situations: a study before and after intervention with announcers of a university radio. Distúrb Comun. 2022;34(4):e57797.
Submetido em:
22/09/2024
Aceito em:
07/01/2025
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email